Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & Dr.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble
O R D E R PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER:
1. 1. These two appeals by assessee, out of which first appeal ( is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-II, Surat hereinafter referred as “ld.CIT(A)” dated 19.03.2013 in quantum assessment and second appeal in against the penalty levied by assessing officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for same assessment year i.e. 2006-07.
2. Both appeals came up hearing on 26th April 2021. The assessee has already filed application dated 23.04.2021 contending therein that the assessee has settled dispute with the Department under Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme–2020 and had already received Form-3. The assessee filed Form-3, for Shree Sai Developers Vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2, Surat. / for A.Y. 2006-07 each assessment year under Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 the details of which are as follows: i) For 1393/AHD/2013, A.Y.2006-07 FORM-3, dated 09.04.2021 vide Acknowledgment No.339498830090421 issued by PCIT, Valsad.
The Ld.Authorised Representative (AR) for assessee prayed for withdrawal of both the appeals.
The ld.Departmental Representative (Sr.DR) appearing for the Revenue has no objection if both the appeals of assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
We have considered the submission of both the parties and seen the contents of Form-3 (supra). Considering the contents of the application filed by the assessee and submission of Ld.AR for the assessee, both appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn being settled. Resultantly, the both appeals of the Assessee are dismissed. The AO is directed to pass consequential order as per CBDT Circular No.3/2021 dated 04.03.2021. Order pronounced on 26th April 2021 at the time of hearing of appeal.