M/S. RONAK OIL MILLS PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(1), SURAT

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1622/AHD/2016Status: DisposedITAT Surat27 April 2021AY 1995-962 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal considered the assessee's application and the Revenue's no objection. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn due to the settlement under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal for Assessment Year 1995-96. The assessee later filed an application to withdraw the appeal, stating that the dispute was settled under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn when the dispute has been settled under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT

Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Honble & Dr.SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Honble

Hearing: 27.04.2021

PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMEBER:

1.

This appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-II, Surat hereinafter referred as “Ld.CIT(A)” dated 16.09.2015 for the assessment year (AY) 1995-96. 2. This appeal came up hearing on 27th April 2021. The assessee has already filed application dated 25.03.2021 contending therein that the assessee has settled dispute with the Department under Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme–2020 and had already received Form-3, vide Certificate No.276080170270221 issued from the office of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1, dated 27.02.2021 copy

M/s.Ronak Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ITO, Ward-2(1)(1), Surat. / ITA No.1622/AHD/2016 for A.Y. 1995-96 of which is filed. The assessee through application requested for withdrawal of appeal.

3.

The ld.Departmental Representative (Sr.DR) appearing for the Revenue has no objection if the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Considering the contents of the application filed by the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn being settled. Resultantly, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed. The AO is directed to pass consequential order as per CBDT Circular No.3/2021 dated 04.03.2021. Order pronounced on 27th April 2021 at the time of hearing of appeal. (Dr.ARJUN LAL SAINI) (PAWAN SINGH) (लेखा सद"य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ("याियक सद"य/JUDICIAL MEMBER) सुरत/ Surat, "दनांक Dated: 27th April 2021/#SGR Copy of order sent to- Assessee/AO/Pr. CIT/ CIT (A)/ ITAT (DR)/Guard file of ITAT. By order / // /

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →