SHRI RAJESH CHOUDHARY,JAIPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-6-2, JAIPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal as the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme' petition was accepted. The revenue did not object to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2010-11. The assessee subsequently filed a petition under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' to settle the matter.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee due to settlement under the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme'.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 659/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 659/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2010-11 cuke Sh. Rajesh Choudhary, ITO Vs. C-329, Near 80ft. Road, Mahesh Ward 6(2), Nagar, Jaipur Jaipur ToLFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AKAPC6573C vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. R. S. Poonia (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Addl.CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 10/12/2020 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement :10/12/2020 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. The assessee has filed the present appeal against the order of ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 23.04.2019 for the assessment year 2010-11.
The ld A/R has stated that the assessee has filed a petition under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle the aforesaid matter and the said petition has been accepted and Form 3 has been issued on 02.11.2020 by the Designated Authority and which has been received by the assessee. It was accordingly requested that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal. 2 Rajesh Choudhary vs. ITO, Jaipur 3. The ld. DR is heard who did not raise any specific objection in accepting the said prayer of withdrawal of appeal by the assessee.
In view of above, the prayer of the assessee is accepted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- Harinder Singh Rawat vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026