M/S. KAY TEE LON IMPEX PVT. LTD.,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(3), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the VSV-20 scheme and received Form-3. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the assessment order for AY 2007-08. During the pendency of the appeal, the assessee opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (VSV-20) and settled the dispute with the department.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee has settled the dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
1.
This appeal by assessee is directed against the orders of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-1, Surat, dated 04.09.2017, which in turn arise from the assessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Act on 23.02.2015 for assessment year (AY) 2007-08. The appeal came up hearing on 20th May 2021. The learned Authorised representative (AR) for the assessee submits that the assessee has availed the benefits of Vivad se Visvas Scheme -2020 (VSV-20) and has settled the dispute with department and has received Form- 3 of VSV-20 and this appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. The ld AR for the assessee also filed the copy of Form-3 of VSV-20 bearing M/s.Kay Tee Lon Impex Pvt. Ltd., (AY: 2007-08), Acknowledgement No. 221253820200121. The ld.AR for the assessee prayed for withdrawal of appeal.
2. On the other hand the learned Senior Departmental Representative (Sr DR) submits that she has no objection if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. We have considered the submissions of ld. Representative of bothz the parties. And considering the fact assessee that the assessee has settled the dispute with the department under VSV-20, and has received Form-3 of VSV -20, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the assessee as well as to the revenue that in case, if the application preferred by the assessee under VSV-20 does not get finally settled for any reason whatsoever, then both the parties are at liberty to prefer Miscellaneous Application before this Tribunal for restoration of this appeal and in such event, the appeals shall get restored. The assessing officer is directed to pass consequential order as per CBDT Circular No. 3/2021 dated 04.03.2021. In the result, appeal of the assessee dismissed as withdrawn. Order announced at the time of hearing of appeal on 20th May 2021 in the Virtual Court hearing.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- Kundan Patel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Pacific Export vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Kashiram Fuels Lole Propritorship Firm Through Proprietor Swati vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026