BHANUMATIBEN DHANSUKHLAL GHEEWALA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1)(1), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's application under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and the request for withdrawal. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee applied for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and paid taxes. The assessee requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal due to the assessee's participation in the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not Applicable
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM
O R D E R
PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the assessment year 2014-15, is directed against the order passed by the ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals), Surat dated 23.04.2018.
At the outset itself, we note that Shri Kiran K.Shah, CA appeared on behalf of the assessee has submitted that assessee has filed an application under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme on 30.01.2021, vide Ask. No.233336301300121, and taxes were also paid. Form No.3 and 4 were filed by assessee, however, Form NO.5 is still awaited. Therefore, Ld.Counsel prayed the Bench to pass conditional order. A copy of Ack number under ‘the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, filed by the assessee in the Income Tax Department on 30.01.2021, vide Ack. No.233336301300121 issued by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat for Appeal Reference Number.447/SRT/2018 is also placed before the Bench. The Assessee prayed for A.Y. 2014-15 Bhanumatiben Dhansukhlal Gheewala withdrawal of the appeal to which, the learned Departmental Representative did not raise any objection.
We have gone through the Ack.No.233336301300121 filed by the assessee to obtain the benefit of ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ and noted that assessee has prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. The Ld.Sr.DR for the Revenue did not have any objection if the said appeal is withdrawn by the assessee company. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
We also make it clear that if the assessee’s application is not admitted under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, then assessee is at liberty to move an application before this Tribunal praying for recalling this order, then this order may be recalled.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee ( ) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026