JANAPRIYA ENGINEERS SYNDICATE JV,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(1), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal upheld the disallowance of Section 80IB deduction, following its previous orders in identical cases for the same project. The assessee's appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2015-16 challenged the disallowance of Section 80IB deduction. The assessee did not appear before the tribunal, and the case proceeded ex-parte.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correctness of the disallowance of Section 80IB deduction. The tribunal also considered the principle of judicial consistency.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER BENCH: This assessee’s appeal for AY 2015-16 is directed against the CIT(A) - 6, Hyderabad’s order dated 03/05/2018 passed in case No. 10319/2017-18/B2/CIT(A)- 6 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”. We have heard both the parties. Case file perused.
:- 2 -: /Hyd/19 Janapriya Engineers Syndicate JV, Hyd.
Case called twice. None appeared at assessee’s behest. Case file suggests that this bench has been adjourning the instant appeal on multiple occasions since 06/11/2020.
We thus proceed ex-parte against assessee in these facts and circumstances. Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey invited our attention to assessee’s soul substantive grievance challenging correctness of both the lower authorities disallowing section 80IB deduction amounting to Rs. 19,92,459/- in the course of assessment as affirmed in the lower appellate proceedings. He next took us to tribunal’s common order passed in assessee’s cases’ to 716/Hyd/2019 for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 dated 17/12/2020 upholding the lower authorities identical action disallowing section 80IB deduction for the very project(s). We thus adopt judicial consistency in the given facts and circumstances and affirm the lower authorities action under challenge. The assessee fails in its sole substantive grievance.
:- 3 -: /Hyd/19 Janapriya Engineers Syndicate JV, Hyd.
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on 2nd February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 80IB
- D.C.I.T., Circle - 10(1), Kolkata vs M/S. Berger Paints India Ltd., KolkataITA 740/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Tasa Foods Private Limited, Bangalore vs DCIT, Circle-7(1)(1), BengaluruITA 2908/BANG/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed7 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Uflex Limited, Delhi vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 280/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida vs Uflex Limited, DelhiITTPA 272/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2020-21
- Uflex Limited, Pamposh Enclave, Greater… vs DCIT/ACIT Cen Cir-II, NoidaITTPA 260/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026