SHREE JOSHI EDUCATION TRUST,BARDOLI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee's Authorized Representative requested to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal. The Tribunal considered the submissions and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Shree Joshi Education Trust, appealed against the rejection of its application for registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act by the CIT(E). The rejection was based on incomplete submissions and allegations of no genuine charitable activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12AA was justified, and whether the assessee was carrying out genuine charitable activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee by Mr. Esmayeel Saherwala, CA Revenue by Mr. Ritesh Mishra, CIT-DR Date of hearing 09/07/2021 Date of pronouncement 09/07/2021 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the orders of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Exemption) [in short CIT(E)], Ahmedabad dated 24.01.2018. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are summarized as under: i. Ld. CIT(E) has erred on facts in rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AA of the Act on the grounds of partly submissions as well as no genuine charitable activities carried out by the Trust. ii. Ld. CIT(E) has erred on facts in not considering/overlooking detailed submissions sent by speed post letter dated 27.09.2017 & 29.12.2017 and also sent through FAX on 29.12.2017. iii. The appellant prays to quash the rejection of application made by the Ld. CIT(E) and allow the registration 12AA of the Act.
2. The appeal came up for hearing 09.07.2021, the Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R) of the assessee submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal. The Ld. AR further submits that he may be given liberty to file fresh application under section 12AA before Ld. CIT(E). 2 Shree Joshi Education Trust
3. The Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax-Departmental Representative (CIT- DR), appearing on behalf of the Revenue submits that he has no objection if the appeals of assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
4. We have considered the contention of both the parties. Considering the submission of Ld. AR of the assessee, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to cost.
5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order announced on 09th July 2021 in the virtual court at the time of hearing.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026