RAM DEO JAT,SHILLONG vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, SHILLONG
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the lower authorities made additions mechanically without considering the assessee's explanations and reconciled statements. The additions were therefore not sustainable in law.
What were the facts?
A survey action was conducted at the assessee's business premises, revealing a difference in physical stock and cash balance compared to the books of account. The Assessing Officer made additions based on these discrepancies, which were upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether additions made on account of stock and cash discrepancies found during a survey are justified without considering the assessee's explanations and reconciled statements.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA BENCH “SMC” GAUHATI
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 24-01-2019 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Shillong [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’].
In this appeal, the assessee has taken the following grounds of appeal:- “1.1 Discrepancy in Value of Stock That the learned Assessing Officer has made addition of Rs. 11,60,736/- as the difference in physical stock and the stock as per books of account. Total Additions and calculations made are presumptive basis and does not reflect act
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 133A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ranchhodbhai Kurjibhai Kakadiya, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 553/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Amr Infrastructures, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Central Circle-2(1), HyderabadITA 818/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Vikaskumar Macwan, Nadiad vs Dc/ACIT Central Circle 3, VadodaraITA 2022/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026