RAVELA HANUMANTHA RAO,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that keeping the appeal pending would serve no purpose as the assessee is pursuing settlement. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to seek revival if settlement benefits are denied.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2009-10. The assessee stated that they are availing settlement benefits under the 'Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020'. The assessee requested the appeal not be dismissed as withdrawn pending finalization of settlement pleas.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal should be kept pending when the assessee is availing a settlement scheme, and the implications of dismissing such an appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “SMC”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA
This assessee’s appeal for AY.2009-10 arises from the CIT(A)-12, Hyderabad’s order dated 05-08-2019 passed in appeal No.10243/2018-19, in proceedings u/s. 143(3) r.w.s.147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’].
Learned counsel representing the assessee stated at the bar that she does not wish to press for the instant appeal as the taxpayer herein is availing settlement benefit under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’. & Form Nos.1 & 2 are to be filed at his behest.
The assessee’s sole identical plea in this case therefore is that since the department is yet to finalise the settlement pleas, this appeal may not be dismissed as withdrawn as on date. I find no merit in assessee’s above stated contention per se. The fact remains that the assessee is filing for settlement benefit and therefore, no purpose would be served if this appeal is kept pending till the time the above stated settlement scheme is in operation. I dismiss this appeal as withdrawn and further make it clear that it shall be open for the assessee to file for revival of his corresponding case if the above settlement benefit is denied to him for technical reasons. Ordered accordingly.
This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open court on the 4th March, 2021
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026