P VENKATARAMI REDDY, NANDYAL,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD-2, NANDYAL, NANDYAL
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal considered the assessee's request and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. The assessee had no further grievance as relief was granted by the CIT (Appeals).
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later filed a petition to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be dismissed as withdrawn based on their request. The primary issue was the assessee's change of stance after filing the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony
This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2009-10 against the order of the CIT -III, Hyderabad, dated 14.03.2014.
At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted a letter stating as under: “Petition for permission for withdrawal of appeal” The above mentioned appeal is posted for hearing before the Hon'ble ITAT, Bench-B on 24.2.2021. In this regard the appellant submits that the said appeal is against the order u/s 263 of the I.T.Act. The Assessing officer also passed consequential order u/s 143(3) r.ws. 263 of the LT. Act. The appellant filed an appeal against the assessment made u/s 143(3) r.w.s.
The learned CIT (Appeals) granted relief in the appeal and therefore, the appellant has no grievance. A copy of the appellate order of CIT (Appeals), Kurnool dated 3.7.2018 is annexed. The appellant, therefore, requests the Hon'ble ITAT to kindly treat the appeal as not pressed. Sd/- (S.Rama Rao) Counsel for Assessee Date: 24.2.2021”
Taking the same into consideration, the assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24th February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026