DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), HYDERABAD vs. INVENTAA CHEMICALS LIMITED, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal followed its own Special Bench decision in the assessee's own case for earlier assessment years. This decision held that income from mushroom production is agricultural income and not business income.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer treated income from mushroom farming as business income. The assessee claimed it as agricultural income eligible for exemption under Section 10(1). The CIT(A) allowed the assessee's claim.
What were the issues?
Whether income derived from mushroom farming/production is agricultural income eligible for exemption under Section 10(1) of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER BENCH:
This Revenue’s appeal for AY 2013-14 is directed against the CIT(A) - 7, Hyderabad’s order dated 12/11/2018 passed in Case No. 0261/CIT(A)-7/2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. We have heard both the parties. Case file perused.
:- 2 -: Inventaa Chemicals Ltd., Hyd.
The revenue’s sole grievance in the instant appeal challenges correctness of the CIT(A) action treating assessee’s income of Rs. 10,74,11,403/- from mushroom farming/production as agricultural entitled for exemption u/s 10(1) of the IT Act. The Assessing Officer’s assessment order had treated as business income. 2.1 We notice, during the course of hearing that the instant sole issue involved herein is no more res-integra. This tribunal’s Special Bench’s decision DCIT Vs. Inventaa Chemicals Ltd., (assessee’s own case for AYs 2008-09 to 2012-13) (2018) 172 ITD 1 (Hyd.) (SB), has already declined the Revenue’s very argument that the income derived from mushroom production is business income. We thus adopt the judicial consistency to uphold the CIT(A)’s order treating the income derived by the assessee from mushroom cultivation as agricultural income entitled for section 10(1) exemption.
:- 3 -: Inventaa Chemicals Ltd., Hyd.
This Revenue’s appeal is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on 25th February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 10(1)
- Sharma Dharmendra Gorakhnath HUF, Shrirampur vs ITO WD 2 Ahmednahar, ITO AhmednagarITA 1156/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Prafulldan Motising Gadhvi, Ahmedabad vs ITO Ward 4(2)(1) Ahmedabad, Pratyaksha Kar…ITA 2589/AHD/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Pramod Dwivedi, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-1(2), RaipurITA 597/RPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sukhveer Singh Dhilow, Ashoknagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ashok NagarITA 373/AGR/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- Yeddula Venkata Narayana Reddy, Bellary vs ITO, Ward1 & Tps, HospetITA 415/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026