B. SURENDER REDDY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-15(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to reinstate if the scheme is not accepted.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2008-09 was directed against an order passed under Section 144 read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal to avail a tax settlement scheme. The primary issue was the procedural aspect of withdrawing the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER BENCH: This assessee’s appeal for AY 2008-09 is directed against the CIT(A) – 7, Hyderabad’s order, dated 16/11/2017 passed in case No. 0231/CIT(A)–7/2016-17 involving proceedings u/s 144 rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”.
:- 2 -: B. Surender Reddy, Hyderabad.
At the outset, ld. counsel for the assessee requested the Bench for permission to withdraw assessee’s appeal as the assessee has opted to avail ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ and had filed Form No. 1 & 2 and Form 3 is issued by the Revenue.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn since the assessee has preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Form No.1 & 2 and Form-3 is issued by the Revenue. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee's case is not accepted in the Vivad-Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then assessee shall be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Petitions before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate his appeal.
:- 3 -: B. Surender Reddy, Hyderabad.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Pronounced in the open court on 25th February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Sr Rice Mill Deppo vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Saswat Traders, Jagatsinghpur vs. The Chief Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026