CHEMELI BAI AGARWAL,SECUNDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-10(3), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. It was clarified that if the Vivad-se-Vishwas scheme is not accepted, the assessee can seek reinstatement of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2014-15 was before the ITAT. The assessee had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020 and filed the necessary forms.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”: HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER BENCH: This assessee’s appeal for AY 2014-15 is directed against the CIT(A) - 6, Hyderabad’s order, dated 06/06/2018 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) rws 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ; in short “the Act”.
:- 2 -: Chemeli Bai Agarwal, Sec’bad.
At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has opted to avail ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ and had filed Form No. 1 & 2 and is awaiting to receive Form 3 from the revenue and, therefore, requested the Bench for permission to withdraw this appeal.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn since the assessee has preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Form No.1 & 2 and is awaiting to receive Form-3 from the Revenue. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss the appeals of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee's case is not accepted in the Vivad-Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then assessee shall be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Petitions before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate her appeal.
:- 3 -: Chemeli Bai Agarwal, Sec’bad.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed in above terms. Pronounced in the open court on 25th February, 2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026