VARSANT HOME APPLIANCES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(3), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the assessee's appeal against the original assessment order under Section 143(3) was already pending, the Section 154 rectification appeal should also be restored to the CIT(A). This is to avoid contradictory decisions and ensure consistency.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rectifying the gross figures from Rs. 77,65,38,002 to Rs. 7,76,53,800. This correction was made for the purpose of estimating the assessee's income at 5% of gross receipts.
What were the issues?
Whether a Section 154 rectification order should be adjudicated separately when the original assessment order is under appeal before the CIT(A). The need for consistency between the rectification and original assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B” : HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
O R D E R PER S.S.GODARA, J.M. :
This assessee’s appeal for AY.2012-13 arises from the CIT(A)-5, Hyderabad’s order dated 27-03-2018 passed in appeal No.0297/2016-17/CIT(A)-5, CIT(A), Hyderabad-5/ 10273/2016-17 in proceedings u/s.154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]. Heard both parties. Case file perused.
It emerges at the outset that we are dealing with Section 154 proceedings only than an assessment framed u/s.143(3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer’s order u/s.154 dt.16-12- 2015 have adopted gross figures at Rs.7,76,53,800/- as against Rs.77,65,38,002/- shown in the Profit and Loss account as accepted in Section 143(3) assessment dt.31-03- 2015. He therefore adopted the former figure only for the purpose of estimating assessee’s income @5% of the gross receipts. We next notice that assessee’s appeal u/s.143(3) of the Act is already pending before the CIT(A). That being the case, we are of the view that the instant Section 154 rectification appeal must also follow the suit as of now so as to avoid mutual contradictions. We thus restore the assessee’s instant lis back to the CIT(A) for his appropriate adjudication as per law along with that that involving 143(3) proceedings for the sake of consistency and brevity. All other pleadings on merits are rendered infructuous.
This assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open court on 18th March, 2021
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026