VARSANT HOME APPLIANCES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-17(3), HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1365/HYD/2018Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad18 March 2021AY 2012-133 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that since the assessee's appeal against the original assessment order under Section 143(3) was already pending, the Section 154 rectification appeal should also be restored to the CIT(A). This is to avoid contradictory decisions and ensure consistency.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, rectifying the gross figures from Rs. 77,65,38,002 to Rs. 7,76,53,800. This correction was made for the purpose of estimating the assessee's income at 5% of gross receipts.

What were the issues?

Whether a Section 154 rectification order should be adjudicated separately when the original assessment order is under appeal before the CIT(A). The need for consistency between the rectification and original assessment proceedings.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B” : HYDERABAD

Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU

O R D E R PER S.S.GODARA, J.M. :

This assessee’s appeal for AY.2012-13 arises from the CIT(A)-5, Hyderabad’s order dated 27-03-2018 passed in appeal No.0297/2016-17/CIT(A)-5, CIT(A), Hyderabad-5/ 10273/2016-17 in proceedings u/s.154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’]. Heard both parties. Case file perused.

2.

It emerges at the outset that we are dealing with Section 154 proceedings only than an assessment framed u/s.143(3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer’s order u/s.154 dt.16-12- 2015 have adopted gross figures at Rs.7,76,53,800/- as against Rs.77,65,38,002/- shown in the Profit and Loss account as accepted in Section 143(3) assessment dt.31-03- 2015. He therefore adopted the former figure only for the purpose of estimating assessee’s income @5% of the gross receipts. We next notice that assessee’s appeal u/s.143(3) of the Act is already pending before the CIT(A). That being the case, we are of the view that the instant Section 154 rectification appeal must also follow the suit as of now so as to avoid mutual contradictions. We thus restore the assessee’s instant lis back to the CIT(A) for his appropriate adjudication as per law along with that that involving 143(3) proceedings for the sake of consistency and brevity. All other pleadings on merits are rendered infructuous.

3.

This assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms.

Order pronounced in the open court on 18th March, 2021

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →