RAJYALAKSHMI GILLELLA, YERRAGUNTLA,KADAPA vs. ITO, WARD-1, PRODDUTUR, KADAPA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had obtained relief on merits in consequential proceedings. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263. The assessee subsequently sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw the appeal after obtaining relief in consequential proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kurnool, dated 15/03/2017 passed U/s. 263 of the Act for the A.Y. 2009-10.
At the outset, the Ld. AR for the assessee placed before us letter dated 11/03/2021 and submitted that the assessee got relief on merits in the consequential proceedings that ensued pursuant to the order passed which is impugned in the present appeal. Therefore, the assessee desires to withdraw her present appeal. The relevant portion from the assessee’s letter (supra) is extracted herein below for reference:-
The above appeal is filed against the order dated 15/03/2017 passed by the Ld. Pr. CIT exercising jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant got relief on merits in the consequential proceedings that ensued pursuant to the order passed which is impugned in the present appeal. In view of the above, the appellant desires to withdraw her present appeal. It is prayed that the Hon’ble Tribunal many be pleased to allow the appellant to withdraw appeal and oblige.”
On perusal of the letter dated 11/03/2021 filed by the assessee seeking permission to withdraw her present appeal and also considering the Learned Departmental Representative’s no objection on this regard, we permit the assessee to withdraw her appeal.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open Court on 18th March, 2021.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026