GLOBAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,KHAMMAM vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found it appropriate to allow the Assessing Officer to adjudicate the issue afresh. The assessee is to appear before the AO with relevant evidence explaining the source of cash deposits.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2012-13 concerns an unexplained cash credit addition of Rs. 3,04,804. The lower authorities did not consider corresponding withdrawals when making the addition.
What were the issues?
The primary issue is the correctness of the unexplained cash credit addition, considering the lack of consideration for corresponding withdrawals by the lower authorities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘SMC’ BENCH : Hyderabad
Before: SHRI S.S. GODARA
Date of Hearing : 24/03/2021 Date of Pronouncement : 20/04/2021 O R D E R This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2012-13 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) “[CIT(A)]”-9, Hyderabad’s order dated 21.08.2020 passed in case no. 09/10241/2019-20 in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’].
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Coming to the sole substantive issue of correctness of unexplained cash credit addition made in both lower authorities’ proceedings to the tune of Rs.3,04,804/-, I notice at the outset that corresponding credits of withdrawals, in case has neither been considered nor granted in the course of assessment. Faced with this situation, learned counsel undertakes to explain the sources thereof; if granted a fresh opportunity of hearing, before the Assessing Officer. I deem it appropriate in these facts and circumstances, that the Assessing Officer needs to adjudicate the instant issue afresh. The Global Educational Society, Khammam. assessee or through its authorized representative shall appear before the Assessing officer on or before 30th July, 2021 with all relevant evidence(s) explaining source of cash deposits at its own risk and responsibility within three effective opportunities. Ordered accordingly. This assessee’s appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. Order pronounced in Open Court on 20/04/2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026