SKILL PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee, having obtained relief in the consequential proceedings, sought to withdraw its appeal before the ITAT. The Tribunal permitted the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263. Subsequent to the PCIT's order, the Assessing Officer (AO) redid the assessment and accepted the income as originally assessed.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal filed by the assessee against the PCIT's order under Section 263 has become infructuous due to subsequent favorable assessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad in DIN Lr. No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2019-20/1026865936(1), dated 23/03/2020 passed U/s. 263 of the Act for the A.Y. 2016-17.
At the outset, the Ld. AR for the assessee placed before us letter dated 01/02/2021 and submitted that the assessee got relief on merits in the consequential proceedings that ensued pursuant to the order passed by the Ld.PCIT U/s 263 of the Act which is the impugned Order on which the assessee is presently on appeal before us. It was Therefore submitted that the assessee desires to withdraw its present appeal. The relevant portion from the assessee’s letter (supra) is extracted herein below for reference:-
“…….
4. Consequent to the above order, the ACIT, Hyderabad has redone the assessment in accordance with the issues discussed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Hyderabad examined the issues and accepted the income as assessed in the original order passed U/s. 143(3) dated 14/1/2018 at Rs. 2,15,85,541/-.
In view of the aforesaid order passed U/s. 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act on 25/01/2021, a copy of which is enclosed, the ITAT appeal filed on 27/05/2020 becomes infructuous and the appeal filed is to be dismissed as withdrawn.”
On perusal of the letter dated 01/02/2021 filed by the assessee seeking permission to withdraw its present appeal, We hereby permit the assessee to withdraw its appeal.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Pronounced in the open Court on 20th April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026