MURALI GOLLA,NALGONDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NALGONDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition to the extent of the opening cash balance of Rs. 4,83,957/-. The remaining component of the addition was confirmed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerned cash deposits of Rs. 6,30,000/- treated as unexplained by the lower authorities. The assessee's cash account showed an opening balance of Rs. 4,83,957/- as of April 1, 2016.
What were the issues?
Whether cash deposits can be treated as unexplained when a substantial portion is covered by the opening cash balance.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘ SMC’ BENCH : Hyderabad
Before: SHRI S.S. GODARA
Date of Hearing : 23/03/2021 Date of Pronouncement : 30/03/2021 O R D E R This assessee’s appeal for A.Y. 2018-19 arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ‘[CIT(A)]’ - 3 Hyderabad’s order dated 31.08.2020 passed in case no.10257/2019-20 in proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short ‘the Act’].
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
Coming to the sole substantive grievance that learned lower authorities have erred in law in treating cash deposits of Rs.6,30,000/- as unexplained; I notice at the outset in page 7 of assessee’s paper book containing the tax payer’s cash account that his opening balance as on 01.04.2016 was Rs.4,83,957/-. This clinching fact has gone unrebutted from department side. The fact also remains assessee has not been able to explain the source of remaining cash deposit amounting to Rs.1,47,000/- I therefore direct the Sri Murali Golla, Nalgonda. Assessing Officer to delete the impugned addition to the extent of opening cash balance of Rs.4,83,957/-. Remaining component of the impugned addition shall stand confirmed. Necessary computation will follow as per law.
This assessee’s appeal is partly allowed in above terms. Order pronounced in Open Court on 30/03/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026