M.C.MODI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,HYDERABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the issue of Section 12AA registration back to the CIT (Exemptions) for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to appear with supportive material and was granted three opportunities of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee, MC Modi Educational Trust, sought registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) denied registration on the grounds that the trust deed was unsigned and no charitable activities had been conducted.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of the trust deed due to lack of signatures and the absence of independent charitable activities performed by the trust.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godara
This assessee’s appeal arises from the CIT(E) Hyderabad’s order dated 28.6.2019 passed in appeal No. CIT(E)/Hyd/36(12)(12A)/2018-19 seeking registration u/s 12A of the I.T. Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’].
Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires at the outset that the CIT (Exemption)’s order under challenge has denied section 12AA registration to the assessee inter alia on the ground that its Trust Deed dated 16.11.2015 is as unsigned one thereby not containing the signatures of the settler and witnesses. And also that no independent charitable activities have been performed till date.
Learned counsel’s only case before us that the assessee’s trust deed is very much a valid one as against the CIT (E)’s findings. Faced with this situation, we deem it fit and proper to restore this issue to section 12AA registration back to the CIT (E) for his fresh adjudication. The assessee or its AR shall now appear before the learned CIT on or before 31/08/2021 with all the cogent supportive material at its own risk and responsibility to be followed by three effective opportunities of hearing.
This assessee’s appeal is treated as allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 7th April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026