UMA GALIPALLI,NIZAMABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NIZAMABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme. The Tribunal also granted liberty to refile the appeals if the scheme was not accepted by the Revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessees filed appeals before the ITAT. During the pendency of the appeals, the assessees opted to avail the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme and had filed the necessary forms.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be withdrawn by the assessees due to their opting for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, A.M:
Both the captioned appeals are filed by the assessees. & 2126/Hyd/2020 are filed against the orders of the Ld. CIT(A)- 5, Hyderabad in appeal No. 0450 & 0451/2017-18/CIT(A)-5, both dated 20/08/2018 passed U/s. 143(3) r.w.s 147 and U/s. 250(6) of the Act for the A.Y. 2011-12 respectively.
At the outset, Ld.AR submitted before us that both the assessees desire to withdraw their respective appeals as the assessees have opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. He further submitted that the assessees had filed Form No.1 & 2 and also received Form-3 from the Revenue. It was therefore pleaded, that the instant appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld.AR.
Having heard both the parties through video conference, We are inclined to allow the appeals of the assessees to be withdrawn yielding to the prayer of the Ld. AR as the assessees in the present appeals have preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Forms No.1, 2 and also received Form No.3 from the Revenue. The Ld. DR has also conceded to the request of the Ld. AR. Accordingly, We hereby dismiss both the appeals of the assessees as withdrawn. However, we also make it clear that, if the assessee/s case/s are not accepted in the Vivad-Se- Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the assessee/s shall be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Petition/s before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate their respective appeal/s. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open Court on the 26th April, 2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026