SAILESH GUPTA,RANGA REDDY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessees to withdraw their appeals as they had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessees in two separate appeals desired to withdraw their appeals before the ITAT. They had opted to avail the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme and had filed the necessary forms.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessees' appeals could be withdrawn due to their opting for the Vivad Se Viswas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “SMC”, HYDERABAD
Hyderabad in appeal No.10139/2018-19, dated 28/01/2019 passed U/s. 143(3) r.w.s 250(6) of the Act for the A.Y. 2015-16. is filed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-6, Hyderabad in appeal No. 0137/2016-17/A3/CIT(A)-6, dated 22/03/2019 passed U/s. 144 r.w.s 250(6) of the Act fort the A.Y. 2013- 14.
At the outset, Ld. ARs of the respective assessees submitted before me that the both the assessees desire to withdraw their respective appeals as they have opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. They further submitted that both the assessees had filed Form No.1 & 2 and Form-3 was also received from the Revenue. It was therefore pleaded, that the instant appeals of the assessees may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld. ARs.
Having heard both the parties through video conference, I am inclined to allow the present appeals of both the assessees to be withdrawn yielding to the prayer of the Ld. ARs as the assessees have preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Forms No.1, 2 and Form No.3 was also received from the Revenue. The Ld. DR has also conceded to the request of the Ld. ARs. Accordingly, I hereby dismiss the appeals of the assessees as withdrawn. However, I also make it clear that, if the assessee/s case/s are not accepted in the Vivad-Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the respective assessee/s shall be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Petition/s before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate their respective appeal/s. It is ordered accordingly.
In the result, appeals of both the assessees are dismissed as withdrawn.
Pronounced in the open Court on the 19th April, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026