WILD FLAVORS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS A.M. TODD COMPANY PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR. 1(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the impugned issue under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, and a full and final settlement was issued. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the final order of assessment for AY 2011-12. The assessee later opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme to settle the tax dispute.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the settlement of the tax dispute under the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “J”, MUMBAI
Before: VIKAS AWASTHY & MS. PADMAVATHY S.
Date of hearing 04-07-2023 Date of pronouncement 04-07-2023 O R D E R PER : MS PADMAVATHY S. (AM)
This appeal is against the final order of assessment passed by the DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Mumbai under section 143(3) read with section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, ‘the Act’) dated 3/12/2015 for A.Y. 2011-12.
The assessee, vide letter dated 09/02/2021 has submitted that the assessee has opted for Vivad se Vishwas Scheme (VSVS) for settlement of tax dispute with respect to the appeal under consideration and, therefore, the assessee wishes to 2 ITA 2152/Mum/2016 M/s wild Flavors (India) Pvt Ltd withdraw the appeal. The Ld.DR confirmed the status of VSVS by obtaining a report from the field.
3. We perused the letter filed alongwith the relevant annexures and find that the assessee has settled the impugned issue under and the Vivad Se Vishwas Act,2020 and the authorities have issued the full and final settlement in Form 5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed, as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court at the time of hearing on 04/07/2023.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Barnala Steel Industries Private Limited vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Skd Suppliers Private Limited vs. The Superintendent, Central CGST, Rishra Division, Range-Ii, And AnrCalcutta · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Aasha Industries vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- M/S Bharat Iron Scrap vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 22 Oct 2026
- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026