MAHATMA EDUCATION SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The Tribunal found cogency in the assessee's contentions and accepted the request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the CIT(Exemptions) for the assessment year 2022-23. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal should be granted, considering the recent CBDT circular extending time limits for filing forms related to charitable trusts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
आदेश / O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA (J.M): The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 09/03/2023 passed by CIT(Exemptions) by the quantum of assessment passed u/s.80G for the A.Y.2022-23.
Assessee vide its letter prayed for withdrawal of appeal in A.Y.2022-23. For the sake of convenience, we are reproducing the contents of the said Application as under:-
M/s. Mahatma Education Society “As per the circular number 06 of 2023 dated 24th May, 2023 passed by Ld. CBDT extending time limit to file Form 10A and Form 10AB in relation to charitable and religious trusts, we hereby request you to withdraw the appeal filed by us” 3. Ld. DR has not raised any objection.
We have heard the ld. DR and perused the records, especially the Application of assessee for withdrawal of the Appeal. We find considerable cogency in the contentions of Assessee as aforesaid. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the Appeal and accordingly, we dismiss the Appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 17th July, 2023.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026