THE ADARSHA BHARATHI FARMERS SERVICES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,ANANTAPUR vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, ANANTAPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme and paid the due taxes. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order for AY 2014-15. The appeal suffered from a delay, which was condoned. The assessee later filed for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “A” : HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI S.S.GODARA & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU
This assessee’s appeal for AY.2014-15 arises from the CIT(A)-Kurnool’s order dated 25-03-2019 passed in proceedings u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, ‘the Act’].
It transpires at the outset that this assessee’s instant appeal suffers from 33 days delay stated to be attributable to the reason(s) beyond its control as per condonation petition/affidavit dt. 13-07-2018. No rebuttal has come from the departmental side. The impugned delay is condoned therefore.
At the outset, we are informed during the course of hearing from the assessee’s side that it has filed for settlement benefit under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ in prescribed Form No.1 & 2 and Form(s)-3 in tune thereto; also stands issued followed by payment of all due tax(es) therefore.
This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30th April, 2021
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026