SHRI SURESH KEWALRAM KHEMANI,DAMAN vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VALSAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal treated the appeal as withdrawn by the assessee. The Revenue did not oppose the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263. During the hearing, the assessee sought to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRIPAWAN SINGH, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM
सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of Hearing : 08/09/2021 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 08/09/2021 आदेश / O R D E R PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the assessment year 2015-16, is directed against the order passed by the ld.Commissioner of Income Tax, Valsad passed in case No.Pr.CIT/VLS/HQ/263 order/SKK/2017-18/ dated 22.01.2018 in proceedings u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee. Case file suggests that the assessee has filed his letter dated 01.07.2021 seeking to withdraw the instant appeal. The Revenue is fair enough in not opposing the same during the course of hearing, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the Assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order is pronounced at the time of hearing of appeal on 08/09/2021 in the Virtual Court of hearing. Sd/- Sd/- (PAWAN SINGH) (Dr. A.L. SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Surat/िदनांक/ Date:08/09/2021 Dkp Outsourcing Sr.P.S.
A.Y. 15-16 Sh. Suresh K Khemani
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026