VIKRAM KUMAR KIMTEE,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, noting that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme. It was clarified that the assessee could seek revival of the case if the settlement benefit was denied for technical reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2008-09 against an order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 153A. During the hearing, the assessee informed the tribunal that they had applied for settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘A’ BENCH : Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. MADHAVI DEVI & Shri L.P. SAHU
O R D E R PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.
This assessee’s appeal for AY 2008-09 arises against the CIT(A)-11, Hyderabad’s order dated 21.12.2017 in case no. 23 to 26/2017-18 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
At the outset, we are informed during the course of hearing from the assessee’s side that the assessee has filed for settlement benefit under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ by way of Form No.1 & 2, and Vikram Kumar Kimtee, Hyd. AY 2008-09 Form-3 is yet to be received. Hence learned counsel for assessee requested permission to withdraw the appeal. 3. We dismiss this appeal as withdrawn and further make it clear that it shall be open for the assessee to file for revival of the case if the settlement benefit is denied for technical reasons. 4. This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms. Order pronounced in Open Court on 06/05/2021.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026