THE ACIT.,CENT.CIRCLE-2, SURAT vs. SHREEJI PRINTS PVT.LTD., SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the revision order under Section 263 was quashed by a prior ITAT order, all subsequent orders became void. Therefore, the Revenue's appeal had no merit.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which granted relief to the assessee. The CIT(A)'s order was based on a previous ITAT order that had quashed the revision order passed under Section 263. The Revenue's appeal against the ITAT order to the High Court was dismissed.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable when the underlying revision order has been quashed and subsequent appeals have been dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee by Ms. Chetali Shah, CA Revenue by Shri H.P.Meena, CIT-DR Date of hearing 01.11.2021 Date of pronouncement 01.11.2021 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
1. 1. This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals-2, Surat dated 12.07.2019 for assessment year (AY) 2013-14, which in turn arise from the assessment order passed under section 143(3) read with section 263 dated 17.12.2018.
2. At the outset of hearing the Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) for the assessee submits that this appeal arising out of assessment order passed in pursuance to order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 12.07.2019 the Ld. AR for the assessee submits that against the order of 263 dated 28.03.2018, the assessee filed an appeal before Tribunal in wherein the order of 263 stated dated 28.03.2018 was set aside / quashed vide order darted 31.05.2019.The Revenue challenged the order of Tribunal before the Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in Tax Appeal No.828 of 2019 dated 03.02.2020.The appeal of
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- Kundan Patel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Pacific Export vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Kashiram Fuels Lole Propritorship Firm Through Proprietor Swati vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026