HARI GOPAL REDDY PINNPU,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(5), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. It was clarified that the assessee could seek revival of the case if settlement benefits were denied for technical reasons.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for AY 2013-14. During the hearing, the assessee informed the tribunal that they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD ‘A’ BENCH : Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. MADHAVI DEVI & Shri L.P. SAHU
O R D E R PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.
This assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 arises against the CIT(A)-1, Hyderabad’s order dated 05.02.2019 involving proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). Heard both the parties. Case file perused. 2. At the outset, we are informed during the course of hearing from the assessee’s side that the assessee has filed for settlement benefit under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme-2020’ by way of Form No.1 & 2, and vsvs Hari Gopal Reddy Pinnpu, Hyd.
Form-3 has also been received. Hence learned counsel for assessee requested permission to withdraw the appeal. 3. We dismiss this appeal as withdrawn and further make it clear that it shall be open for the assessee to file for revival of the case if the settlement benefit is denied for technical reasons. 4. This assessee’s appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms. Order pronounced in Open Court on 31/05/2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026