SURENDER REDDY BUSIREDDY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration, allowing the assessee an opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2011-12 was decided ex-parte as the Assessing Officer observed that no return of income was filed. The assessee claimed a return was indeed filed.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessment order passed ex-parte was valid when the assessee claimed to have filed a return of income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi
This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2011-12 against the order of the CIT (A)-6, Hyderabad, dated 28.5.2020.
At the outset it is seen that the appeal of the assessee has been decided ex-parte the assessee. Further, the assessment has been reopened u/s 148 of the Act by observing that the assessee has not filed his return of income.
The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee had filed his return of income and there is mistake in the observation of the Assessing Officer that the assessee has not filed his return of income. He submitted that the assessment may be remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo consideration.
The learned DR also agreed for a remand of the assessment to the file of the Assessing Officer. Therefore, taking the submissions of the assessee into consideration, I deem it fit and proper to set aside the order of the CIT (A) and remand the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo consideration in accordance with law. Needless to mention that the assessee shall be given a fair opportunity of hearing and the assessee shall also cooperate with the Assessing Officer for early completion of the assessment of his income for the relevant A.Y.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026