SURENDER REDDY BUSIREDDY,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-14(2), HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 506/HYD/2020Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 June 2021AY 2011-122 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the issue to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration, allowing the assessee an opportunity of hearing.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal for AY 2011-12 was decided ex-parte as the Assessing Officer observed that no return of income was filed. The assessee claimed a return was indeed filed.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessment order passed ex-parte was valid when the assessee claimed to have filed a return of income.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad

Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi

Hearing: 21/06/2021Pronounced: 21/06/2021

This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2011-12 against the order of the CIT (A)-6, Hyderabad, dated 28.5.2020.

2.

At the outset it is seen that the appeal of the assessee has been decided ex-parte the assessee. Further, the assessment has been reopened u/s 148 of the Act by observing that the assessee has not filed his return of income.

3.

The learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee had filed his return of income and there is mistake in the observation of the Assessing Officer that the assessee has not filed his return of income. He submitted that the assessment may be remanded to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo consideration.

4.

The learned DR also agreed for a remand of the assessment to the file of the Assessing Officer. Therefore, taking the submissions of the assessee into consideration, I deem it fit and proper to set aside the order of the CIT (A) and remand the issue to the file of the Assessing Officer for denovo consideration in accordance with law. Needless to mention that the assessee shall be given a fair opportunity of hearing and the assessee shall also cooperate with the Assessing Officer for early completion of the assessment of his income for the relevant A.Y.

More judgments on Section 148

All 35,022 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →