MURALI KRISHNAM RAJU VEGESNA VENKATA,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-11(2), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeals to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The CIT(A) was directed to provide three effective opportunities of hearing to the assessees.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed against ex-parte orders passed by the CIT(A) which affirmed additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of "other" sources. The assessees contended that the CIT(A) orders were passed without proper service of notice.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) orders were passed ex-parte without proper service of notice and whether the assessees were denied natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
2 & 194/Hyd/2020 O R D E R Per Shri S.S. Godara, J.M. : These assessee's appeals for Assessment Year 2011- 12 are directed against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-5, Hyderabad’s separate orders; both dt.16.12.2019, passed in case No. 10317/2018-19/CIT(A)- 5 and case No.10316/2018-19/CIT(A)-5; respectively in proceedings u/s.144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act').
Heard both the parties. Case files perused.
Learned authorized reprentative of the assessees submitted at the outset We notice at the outset that these twin CIT(A)’s orders; affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making income from “other” sources addition(s) of Rs.1,14,76,151 and Rs.1,14,93,944; respectively, have been passed exparte. And that too, without even indicating as to whether assessees had been actually served at the last hearing notice(s) or not. We thus restore the assessee's substantive grievance(s) back to the CIT(A) for his afresh appropriate adjudication as per law within three effective opportunities of hearing. These assessees or their
These twin assessee's appeals are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective files.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21st June,2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026