OMKARAM TUKKAPURAM,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-13(4), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution due to the inability to bring the legal heirs on record and their non-response. The legal heirs were granted liberty to seek recall of the order within the stipulated time.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal for AY 2008-09 was filed. The assessee expired after filing the appeal, and the legal heirs were not cooperating with the counsel to be brought on record. Notices sent to the assessee's last known address were returned stating the assessee had moved.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the non-prosecution of the appeal due to the death of the assessee and the inability to bring the legal heirs on record.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Smt. P. Madhavi Devi
This is assessee’s appeal for the A.Y 2008-09 against the order of the CIT (A)-4, Hyderabad, dated 6.3.2019.
At the time of hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that after filing of this appeal, the assessee has expired and that he has been trying to get the details of the legal heirs and to bring them on record, but the legal heirs of the assessees are not responding to him. Taking the same into consideration, the Bench had directed the Registry to send notices to the party by RPAD and also through the DR. The notice sent accordingly, has been returned mentioning that the ‘assessee has moved’. Thus, the legal heirs have not received the said notice. Since the legal heirs of the assessee are not responding to the learned Counsel for the assessee and there is no address of the legal heirs given to ITAT by way of any letter, I find no other option but to dismiss the appeal of the assessee for non- prosecution with a liberty to the legal heirs to seek recall of this order of the Tribunal within the time specified under the Act, if they so desire.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is dismissed in limini. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 21st June, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026