TUMMALA SACHENDRA, HYDERABAD,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-12(1) HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1476/HYD/2016Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 June 2021AY 2010-113 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeals as they had opted for the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme. The Revenue did not object to this request.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT and subsequently opted to avail the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme. The assessee requested to withdraw the appeals to pursue the scheme.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw appeals filed before the ITAT to avail the 'Vivad Se Viswas' scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “ ”, HYDERABAD

Before: SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI & SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY

For Respondent: Shri Ravi Kiran, CIT-DR
Hearing: 22/06/2021Pronounced: 24/06/2021

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH “ ”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (AY: 2010-11) (AY: 2010-11) Tummala Sachendra, Vs. ACIT, Hyderabad. Circle-12(1), PAN: AHQPT 3248 N Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: None Revenue by: Shri Ravi Kiran, CIT-DR Date of hearing: 22/06/2021 Date of pronouncement: 24/06/2021 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, AM.:

Both these appeals are filed by the assessee for the AY 2010-11. is filed against the order of the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Hyderabad in F.No.48/Pr. CIT- 2/263(11)2015-16, dated 24/02/2016 passed U/s. 263 of the Act. Ld. CIT (A)-2, Hyderabad in appeal No. 0128/2014-15, dated 28/06/2016.

2.

At the time of hearing, none appeared before us to represent the case of the assessee. On perusal of the record, we find that the assessee desires to withdraw his instant appeals as the assessee has opted to avail ‘Vivad Se Viswas’ scheme. It was further observed that the assessee had filed Form No.1 & 2 and Form-3 was also received from the Revenue in both the appeals.

3.

The Ld. DR submitted that if the assessee wishes to opt Vivad se- Vishwas scheme, the Department has no objection.

4.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, We allow the appeals of the assessee to be withdrawn since the assessee has preferred to avail the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme by filing Forms No.1, 2 and Form No.3 was also received from the Revenue. The Ld. DR has also conceded to the request of the assessee. Accordingly, We hereby dismiss the appeals of the assessee as withdrawn. However, We also make it clear that, if the assessee’s case/s is not accepted in the Vivad- Se-Viswas scheme by the Revenue for whatsoever may be the reason, then the assessee shall be at liberty to file a Miscellaneous Petition/s before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate the appeal/s. It is ordered accordingly.

5.

In the result, two appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.

Pronounced in the open Court on the 24th June, 2021.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →