THE DCIT, CIRCLE-1, SURAT vs. NEO STRUCTO CONSTRUCTION LTD., SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the tax effect involved in the appeal was less than the monetary limit of Rs. 50 lakh for filing appeals before the Tribunal as per CBDT Circular No. 19/2019. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the deletion of penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for AY 2006-07. The penalty amount was Rs. 23,81,576/-.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT considering the tax effect and CBDT circulars. The allowability of expenses claimed by the assessee was also a background issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee by None Revenue by Mrs.Anupma Singla,Sr-DR Date of hearing 27.12.2021 Date of pronouncement 27.12.2021 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by Revenue is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-1, Suratdated 20.06.2011, which in turn arises out of penalty levied under section 271(1)(c) of the income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 17.03.2011for assessment year (AY) 2006-07. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “[1]. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A)-1, Surat has erred in deleting the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act of Rs.23,81,576/- despite the fact that the expenses claimed by the assessee were not allowable under section 37(1) of the I.T. Act. However, assessee deliberately claimed the expenses with a conscious view to reduce the Income-Tax liability. Further, despite giving an opportunity, the assessee failed to offer an explanation for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.”
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026