SARBESWAR SAHOO,KENDRAPARA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request for withdrawal after noting compliance with the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against CIT(A) orders for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15. The assessee sought withdrawal of these appeals to settle the disputes under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw appeals to settle disputes under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: S/SHRI P.M. JAGTAP & CHANDRA MOHAN GARG
O R D E R Per Bench Both the appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate order s of the CIT(A)- Cuttack both dated 30.8.2018 for the assessment years 2013-14 & 2014-15.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the matter was called for hearing. However, the assessee has moved applications dated 10.11.2020 for the assessment year 2013-14 and dated 11.12.2020 for the assessment year 2014-15 seeking withdrawal of these appeals on the ground that he has decided to settle the dispute involved in the said appeals under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee has duly filed the declarations in Form No. 1 and Form No. 2 on 22.6.2020 and the Designated Authority has issued the certificate in Form No. 3 as per
P a g e 1 | 2 80/CTK/201 8 Assessm ent Y ear : 20 13- 14 Section 5(1) of the Scheme accepting the assessee’s declaration under the same Scheme for both the assessment years under consideration.
Keeping in view these facts and circumstances of the case including especially the fact that the assessee has duly complied with the necessary requirements under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, the permission as sought by the assessee is granted and these appeals of the assessee are dismissed treating the same as withdrawn. We also make it clear that in a situation, the grievance of assessee for the year under consideration could not be resolved under Vivad se Vishwas scheme, then the assessee would be entitled to seek recall of this dismissal order by filing a miscellaneous application.
In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 28/1/2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026