HARIPUR KRAFT COMPANY,BAROTIWALA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE, PARWANOO
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had availed the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and a certificate had been issued. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). During the hearing, the assessee's representative was absent but submitted a withdrawal application. The assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and received a certificate under it.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT:
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), Shimla, H.P. dt. 28/03/2019.
During the course of hearing nobody was present on behalf of the assessee however withdrawal application has been furnished which read as under:
Subject-Prayer for permission to withdraw the appeal in the case ofHaripur Kraft Co., AY 2016-17 fixed for hearing on 02.03.2021. Hon'ble Bench, Kindly refer to the matter cited as subject above. We have been directed by the assessee to most respectfully submit that in respect of its appeal it had filed declaration under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 whereby the Worthy Pr. CIT has issued certificate in Form 3. Copy of the same is attached herewith. It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that the permission may please be granted for withdrawal of appeal. We shall be highly obliged.
Thanking You,
Yours Faithfully, Sd/- (Parikshit Aggarwal) Chartered Accountant Counsel for the Assessee
During the course of hearing it is noticed that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing Certificate No. 239691600040221, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
(Order pronounced in the open Court on 02/03/2021 )
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026