DR.NARINDER SINGH BIRDH ASHRAM,SANGRUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH

PDF · subscribers
ITA 118/CHANDI/2020Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 March 20213 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E) and restored the matter for fresh decision. The assessee was directed to appear before the CIT(E) on a specified date.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application for registration as a charitable institution under Section 12A was rejected by the CIT(E). The assessee claimed that the CIT(E)'s order was ex-parte as they did not receive the notice of hearing, which was sent to an incorrect email address.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) order rejecting the registration application was valid when the assessee did not receive the hearing notice due to an incorrect email address.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

आदेश/Order Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 3.12.2019 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [in short ‘CIT(E)’]. 2. The assessee in this appeal has agitated the rejection of application for registration as Charitable Institution u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the impugned order of the CIT(E) is an ex-parte order. That the assessee did not receive the notice of hearing. That, in fact, notice of hearing was sent through e-mail at the e-mail address of son one of the trustee who had left India, therefore, the said e-mail/notice did not come into the notice of the assessee. That the absence of the assessee / applicant on the date of hearing was not intentional. It has, therefore, been prayed by the Ld. Counsel that the assessee may be given an opportunity to present its case before the Ld. CIT(E) .

4.

The Ld. Departmental Representative has not objected to the same.

5.

In view of this, the order of the Ld. CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the CIT(E) for decision afresh. The assessee is directed to appear either in person or through his counsel before the Ld.CIT(E) on 22.3.2021 and further as and when required by the Ld. CIT (E).

With the above observations, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 04.03.2021

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →