DR.NARINDER SINGH BIRDH ASHRAM,SANGRUR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E) and restored the matter for fresh decision. The assessee was directed to appear before the CIT(E) on a specified date.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration as a charitable institution under Section 12A was rejected by the CIT(E). The assessee claimed that the CIT(E)'s order was ex-parte as they did not receive the notice of hearing, which was sent to an incorrect email address.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) order rejecting the registration application was valid when the assessee did not receive the hearing notice due to an incorrect email address.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 3.12.2019 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh [in short ‘CIT(E)’]. 2. The assessee in this appeal has agitated the rejection of application for registration as Charitable Institution u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act'). 3. At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the impugned order of the CIT(E) is an ex-parte order. That the assessee did not receive the notice of hearing. That, in fact, notice of hearing was sent through e-mail at the e-mail address of son one of the trustee who had left India, therefore, the said e-mail/notice did not come into the notice of the assessee. That the absence of the assessee / applicant on the date of hearing was not intentional. It has, therefore, been prayed by the Ld. Counsel that the assessee may be given an opportunity to present its case before the Ld. CIT(E) .
The Ld. Departmental Representative has not objected to the same.
In view of this, the order of the Ld. CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the CIT(E) for decision afresh. The assessee is directed to appear either in person or through his counsel before the Ld.CIT(E) on 22.3.2021 and further as and when required by the Ld. CIT (E).
With the above observations, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on 04.03.2021
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Dirtboot Holidays vs. The Commisssioner Central Goods And Service Tax, New Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Vandemataram Projects Private Limited vs. Raipur Development AuthorityChhattisgarh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026