Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
The assessee has filed an application dated 07/12/2020 pointing out typographical errors, apparent from the record, crept in pages 1 and 54 of the order dated 03/12/2020 mentioning the correct name, PAN number, Assessment Year at respective places.
It is pleaded in the application that in page no 1 bearing 445/Ahd/2016 (Department appeals) name as mentioned in the ITAT order is as Edelweiss Financial Advisors Ltd. [Formerly Known Anagram Stock Broking Ltd], instead of the correct position as mentioned in the first page of the assessment order. Thus, the error crept in the page no.1 stands rectified and may be read as Edelweiss Financial Advisors Ltd. [Formerly Known Anagram Capital Ltd].
2.1 Secondly, in the appeals of the Department bearing Nos.413 & 445/Ahd/2016, Pan Card No. has been wrongly mentioned as “AABCA9956F” instead of “AABCA2916K”. Thus, the error crept in the page no.1 stands rectified and may be read as “AABCA2916K”.
Asstt. Year 2010-11 & others 3 2.2 Thirdly, at page no.1 of the order in Revenue’s appeal bearing Assessment Year has been wrongly mentioned as A.Y. 2012-13 instead of A.Y. 2011-12. Similar mistake is also made in the head line at page no.57 of the order which is mentioned as “Coming to ITA No. 445/Ahd/2016 (A.Y. 2012- 13) Revenue’s Appeal” wherein the Assessment Year is wrongly mentioned as A.Y. 2012-13 instead of A.Y. 2011-12. Thus, the error crept in the page no.1 and head line at page no.57 stands rectified and may be read as Assessment Year 2011- 12.
Therefore, this corrigendum is being issue to remove the above mistakes and it is hereby rectified as such.
Order pronounced in the Court on 24/02/2021 at Ahmedabad.