JPJ INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,CUTTACK vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE,, CUTTACK
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, कटक न्यायऩीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अऩीऱ सं/ITA No.92/CTK/2023 (ननधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2018-2019) JPJ Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT, Central Circle,Cuttack 1, Manik Ghosh Bazar, Purighat, Cuttack-753002 PAN No. :AADCJ 2773 R (अऩीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ननधााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri C.Parida, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 17/07/2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 17/07/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar, dated 30.01.2023, passed in I.T.appeal No.Bhubaneswar-2/11235/2017-18, for the assessment year 2018-2019. 2. At the outset, on perusal of the assessment order and the appellate order, it is found that the assessee has not produced any evidence either before the AO or before the ld.CIT(A). In this regard, ld.AR submitted that one more opportunity may be provided to file all the documents before the ld. CIT(A) to substantiate its claim. 3. In reply, ld Sr DR submitted that proper opportunities were allowed and the assessee could not produce the documents as required by both the authorities below. It was submitted that the orders passed by both the authorities below deserve to be upheld.
2 ITA No.92/CTK/2023 4. We have considered the rival submissions. On perusal of the impugned order, it is found that the assessee could not produce the documents as required by the ld.AO during the course of assessment proceedings as well as ld. CIT(A) during the course of appellate proceedings. Therefore, the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee for not justifying the claim. During the course of hearing ld. AR prayed for one more opportunity to substantiate its claim before the ld. CIT(A). Looking to the nature of assessee in not bothering to produce the evidences before both the authorities below, we impose a cost of Rs.1000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) on the assessee and direct the assessee to produce a copy of the receipt before the ld.CIT(A). In view of the above and looking to the facts of the case, in the interest of justice, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of ld. CIT(A) for readjudication after granting the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard, subject to the assessee providing the receipt of payment of cost of Rs.1000/- on the first date of posting the appeal for hearing. 5. In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 17/07/2023. Sd/- Sd/- (GIRISH AGRAWAL) (GEORGE MATHAN) ऱेखा सदस्य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER कटक Cuttack; ददनाांक Dated 17/07/2023 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S.
3 ITA No.92/CTK/2023 आदेश की प्रनतलऱपऩ अग्रेपषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अऩीऱाथी / The Appellant- 1. JPJ Industries Pvt. Ltd. 1, Manik Ghosh Bazar, Purighat, Cuttack-753002 2. प्रत्यथी / The Respondent- ACIT, Central Circle,Cuttack आयकर आयुक्त(अऩीऱ) / The CIT(A), 3. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. ववभागीय प्रतततनधध, आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, कटक / DR, 5. ITAT, Cuttack गार्ड पाईऱ / Guard file. 6. सत्यावऩत प्रतत //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
(Assistant Registrar) आयकर अऩीऱीय अधधकरण, कटक/ITAT, Cuttack
