M/S I.K. GUJRAL PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY,KAPURTHALA vs. DCIT, C-1, (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had settled the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The revenue did not object to the withdrawal of the appeals.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by the I. K. Gujral Punjab Technical University against orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11. The assessee opted for settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeals should be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
PER ANNAPURNA GUPTA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
The present appeals relate to the same assessee and have been preferred against the orders dated 30.03.2018 &14.12.2018 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Jalandhar [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] for the assessment years2009-10 & 2010-11 respectively ,passed u/s 250(6) of the Income Tax Act,1961(hereinafter referred to as “Act”).
Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted before us that it has opted for the settlement of the dispute under the “ Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” and Form No. 3 has also been issued by the designated authority accepting the assessee’s request.
An application stating the above, along with copy of Form No. 3 issued in both the cases was filed before us. The Ld. DR expressed no objection to the withdrawal.
In view of the above, since the assessee has settled the dispute in the VSV scheme framed by the legislature in this regard, the impugned appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 10.03.2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026