SRI DATTATREYA SAI ASHRAM TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT EXEMPTION CIRCLE, BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the audit report was filed within the extended time limits provided by the CBDT circular and the Supreme Court's suo motu order. Therefore, the disallowance made in the intimation u/s.143(1) was liable to be deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, had its entire expenditure disallowed and exemption u/s.11 denied because its audit report in Form 10B was filed three days after the due date. The assessee argued that the delay was minimal and that extended timelines due to COVID-19 should be considered.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance of expenditure and denial of exemption is justified when the audit report is filed with a minor delay, considering extended timelines due to COVID-19.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 29.12.2022, passed in ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1048342247(1) for the assessment year 2020-2021.
It was the submission of the ld. AR of the assessee that the assessee is a charitable trust. It enjoys the benefit of registration u/s.12AA of the Act. The assessee had filed its return of income for the relevant assessment year and the same came to be processed u/s.143(1) of the Act, wherein the entire expenditure claimed by the assessee came to be disallowed and the exemption u/s.11 of the Act was also disallowed. It was the submission of the ld. AR that the reason for the same was that there were three days delay in filing of the audit report in Form 10B of the Audit. It was the submission that for the assessment year 2020-2021, the due date of filing of the return was 15.02.2021 and the due date for filing the audit report in Form 10B was 15.01.2021. It was the submission that the assessee had filed his return of income on 03.02.2021 being before the due date of filing of return but the audit report was filed only on 18.01.2021 being three days after the due date. It was the submission that the CBDT vide its Circular No.6 of 2023, dated 24th May, 2023, in para 15 has categorically held as follows :- 15. It is clarified that the statement of accumulation in Form No. 10 and Form No. 9A is required to be furnished at least two months prior to the due date of furnishing return of income so that it may be taken into account while auditing the books of account. However, the accumulation/deemed application shall not be denied to a trust as long as the statement of accumulation/deemed application is furnished on or before the due date of furnishing the return as provided in sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act.
It was the submission that the Circular specifically provides that the statement of accumulation/deemed application should be furnished on or before the due date of furnishing the return as provided in sub-section (1) of section 139 of the Act. It was further submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Suo Motu Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020 had extended limitation from 15.03.2020 to 14.03.2021. It was the submission that as the period of limitation for filing of the audit report fell within the time prescribed in the Circular issued by the CBDT and also the period of extension of the limitation as provided in the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, referred to supra, the AO may be directed to delete the disallowance as made by him. It was the further submission that the Notification issued by the CBDT dated 30.12.2020 in S.O.4805(E) has
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026