SUBH LUXMI SECURITIES PVT. LTD. (NOW M/S INDIAN SECURITIES LTD.),DELHI vs. ACIT, CC, PATIALA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal after opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order dated 17/08/2017 of Ld. CIT(A)-5, Ludhiana.
In the present case, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under:
“Sub: Requests for permission to withdraw in the case of Shubh Luxmi Securities Ltd.- now M/s Indian Securities Ltd. Sir, Respectfully it is prayed that permission may kindly be granted to the appellant to withdraw the above mentioned appeal which is listed for hearing for 06/05/2021. The appellant has opted to avail the benefit of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and copy of Form No. 3 issued by the ld. Pr.CIT, Patiala is enclosed.
Thanking you.
2 ITA 1583/Chd/2017 Subh Luxmi Securities P Ltd. Vs ACIT Yours faithfully Sd/- Ashwani, C.A. Counsel for the appellant.”
During the course of hearing the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that since the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e. Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has issued Form No. 3 bearing Certificate NO. 345896050280421 in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
(Order pronounced in the open Court on 06/05/2021)
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shivaraj M S vs. The Union Of INDIAKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026