MOHD.ABDUL KAREEM,KARIMNAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KARIMNAGAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 966/HYD/2018Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 November 2021AY 2014-153 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The assessee was granted liberty to approach the Tribunal to reinstate the appeal if their Vivad Se Vishwas application is rejected.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT for AY 2014-15. The assessee had subsequently filed forms under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and received Form 3 from the department.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

Before: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S. Godara

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao
For Respondent: Shri T. Sunil Goutam
Hearing: 25.11.2021Pronounced: 29.11.2021

O R D E R Per S.S. Godara, J.M. This assessee’s appeal for A.Y 2014-15 arises from the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 8, Hyderabad’s order dated 16.02.2018, in case No.10260/CIT(A)-8/Hyd/2017-18 involving proceedings under section 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short, “the Act”).

Heard both parties. Case file perused.

2.

At the outset, the ld. authorized representative of the assessee submitted that the assessees does not want to pursue the appeal as he has already filed forms I & II under the ‘Direct Tax Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2020’ and received Form 3 from the department. Therefore, consequent to the same, the assessees desires to withdraw the appeal before the Tribunal. Hence it was pleaded, that the appeal of the assessee may be treated as withdrawn.

3.

The ld. DR conceded to the request of the Ld. AR.

4.

After hearing both the parties, according to the request of the assessee and their Ld. AR, we hereby allow the appeal of the assessees to be withdrawn. We also make it clear that the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal within the stipulated time as provided under the Act, in order to reinstate the appeal, if his application with respect to Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme is rejected.

5.

This appeal is dismissed as withdrawn in above terms.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →