Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Vadodara (‘CIT(A)’ in short), dated 27.11.2015 arising in the penalty order dated 30.03.2014 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s. 271(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) concerning AY 2009-10.
[Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. vs. ACIT] A.Y. 2009-10 - 2 - 2. The captioned assessee has sought to withdraw the appeal listed above on the ground that assessee has opted to avail benefits of ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020’ (VSV). When the matter was called for hearing, the ld. counsel for the assessee at the outset has submitted that he does not seek to pursue the said appeal owing to exercise of option for availing VSV Scheme and consequently requested that his application for withdrawal of appeal may please be granted. Reference was also made to written requests in this regard.
The ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue stated that he has no objection to withdraw the appeal in the circumstances narrated on behalf of the assessee.
In the light of written request made on behalf of the captioned assessee, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, in the event, the assessee fails to avail the benefit of VSV Scheme for any bonafide reasons, then the assessee concerned will be at liberty to seek restoration of original appeal for hearing before ITAT in accordance with law.
In the result, the captioned appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This Order pronounced on 20/07/2021