BISWAJIT KARMAKAR,CUTTACK vs. ITO WARD-2(3), CUTTACK

PDF
ITA 220/CTK/2023Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack20 September 2023AY 2011-122 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,

For Appellant: Shri Subit Sahu, Adv
For Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Hearing: 20/09Pronounced: 20/0

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK ‘SMC’ BENCH, CUTTACK , CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.220 & 221/CTK/20 /CTK/2023 Assessment Year : 2011-2012 2012 Biswajit Karamkar, Karamkar, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward Income Tax Officer, Ward- Binod Binod Bihari Bihari Market, Market, 2(3), Cuttack 2(3), Cuttack Balubazar, Cuttack Balubazar, Cuttack PAN/GIR No. PAN/GIR No.AGOPK 4528 P (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Subit Sahu, Adv Subit Sahu, Adv Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR Date of Hearing : 20/09 9/2023 Date of Pronouncement : 20/0 /09/2023 O R D E R These are appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders These are appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders These are appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the ld CIT(A) of the ld CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar dated 21.3.2023, in the matter of penalty 2, Bhubaneswar dated 21.3.2023, in the matter of penalty under section 271A and 271B of the I.T.Act under section 271A and 271B of the I.T.Act for the assessment year 2011 for the assessment year 2011- 12.

2.

Shri Subit Sahu, Adv appeared for the assessee and Shri Shri Subit Sahu, Adv appeared for the assessee and Shri Shri Subit Sahu, Adv appeared for the assessee and Shri S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue. S.C.Mohanty, ld Sr DR appeared for the revenue.

3.

Vide petitions dated 12.9.2023, ld counsel for the assessee seeks to petitions dated 12.9.2023, ld counsel for the assessee seeks to petitions dated 12.9.2023, ld counsel for the assessee seeks to withdraw the appeals. At the time of heari withdraw the appeals. At the time of hearing of the appeals, ld AR also ng of the appeals, ld AR also

P a g e 1 | 2

ITA Nos.220 & 221/CTK/2023 Assessment Year : 2011-2012

state that the assessee does not pursue the appeal, to which, ld Sr DR did not have any objection.

4.

In view of above, I accede to the request of ld AR of the assessee and consequently, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed.

Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 20/09/2023.

Sd.- (George Mathan) JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 20/09/2023 B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Biswajit Karamkar, Binod Bihari Market, Balubazar, Cuttack 2. The Respondent: Income Tax Officer, Ward- 2(3), Cuttack 3. The CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar 4. Pr.CIT, Cuttack 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy// By order

Sr.Pvt.secretary ITAT, Cuttack

P a g e 2 | 2

BISWAJIT KARMAKAR,CUTTACK vs ITO WARD-2(3), CUTTACK | BharatTax