UDALA REGIONAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING SOCITY LIMITED,MAYURBHYANJ vs. ITO,WARD-BBN-W-(9)(91), BHUBANESWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 280/CTK/2023Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack28 November 2023AY 2017-183 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the return was due to a reasonable cause, as the assessee had no control over the CAG's audit process. Therefore, the penalty levied was deleted.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a Semi Govt. Organization, failed to file its return of income within the prescribed time due to the delay in the completion of its audit by the CAG. The AO levied penalty under Section 271F for this failure.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the return of income due to the non-completion of the CAG audit constitutes a reasonable cause for deleting the penalty under Section 271F.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 271F,Section 139(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK

Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL

Hearing: 28/11/2023Pronounced: 28/11/2023

O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated 05.06.2023, passed in ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/1053558701(1), for the assessment year 2017-2018, thereby confirming the levy of penalty u/s.271F of the Act.

2.

It was submitted by the ld. AR that the assessee is a Semi Govt. Organization (AOP), whose accounts are audited by CAG. It was the submission that as the CAG could not complete the audit of the books of accounts of the assessee in time, the assessee could not file its return of income in the prescribed time limit. It was the submission that the AO levied penalty u/s.271F of the Act on the failure of the assessee to file its return of income u/s.139(1) of the Act. It was the submission that as the accounts of the assessee have not been audited, the return filed by the assessee itself would have been an invalid return. It was the submission that the audit was not yet completed and the assessee is yet to file its return and the assessment had also been completed. The audit report has been sent to CAG for signature as early as in 2020 but till date it has not been received by the assessee and the return has not been filed till date. It was the submission that on account of reasonable cause, the penalty as levied by the AO and as confirmed by the ld.CIT(A) may be deleted.

3.

In reply, ld. DR vehemently supported the order of the AO and ld. CIT(A).

4.

We have considered the rival submissions. A perusal of the facts of the present case clearly shows that non-filing of the return u/s.139(1) of the Act was on account of non-completion of audit of the books of accounts by the CAG. The assessee has no control over the CAG and admittedly the delay is attributable to an auditor appointed by the CAG. This admittedly is a reasonable cause. This being so, the reasonable cause given by the assessee is accepted and the penalty as levied by the AO and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) is hereby deleted.

More judgments on Section 271F

All 927 judgments and leading authorities on Section 271F →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →