NARAYAN SINGH CHOUDHARY,KUCHAMAN vs. ITO,WARD-1, MAKRANA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020' and received Form-5. Consequently, it was deemed purposeless to keep the appeal pending.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). At the hearing, no one appeared for the assessee, but a letter indicated an intention to settle the tax litigation under the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020'.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should continue when the assessee intended to settle the dispute under a specific scheme. The Tribunal considered the implications of the 'Vivad se Vishwas Scheme' on the pending appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, JODHPUR
(A.Y: 2014-15) Shri Narayan Singh Vs. ITO – Ward-1 Choudhary Makrana, C/o. Dileep Kumar Rajasthan. Mathur, Station Road, Makrana, Rajasthan. PAN/GIR No. : AATPC7209C Appellant .. Respondent Assessee by : None Revenue by : Ms. Nidhi Nair, JCIT -DR Date of Hearing 10.08.2023 Date of Pronouncement 11.08.2023 आदेश / O R D E R
PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM:
The assessee has filed the appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – II, Jodhpur passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 263 and 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
At the time hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. The assessee has submitted a letter mentioning that the assessee has intend to settle the tax litigation by opting for ‘Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ (VSVS2020)
Narayan Singh Choudhary, Kuchaman - 2 - and filed an application under VSVS Rules 2020. Contra, the Ld. DR has no objections.
We heard the Ld. DR and perused the material on record. Since the assessee has opted for ‘Vivaad se Vishwas Scheme 2020’ and received Form-5 from the income tax department. We are of the view that, no purpose will be served in keeping the appeal pending. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn and the assessee is given liberty to move an application u/s 254(2) of the Act to recall the present order as per provisions of Law.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 11.08.2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026