← Back to search

SATBIR SHARMA,PANIPAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANIPAT

PDF
ITA 4020/DEL/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 August 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “SMC”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESHSatbir Sharma, H. No. 40/13, Bhatnagar Gali, Samalkha Distt. Panipat, Panipat, Haryana Vs. ITO, Ward-4, Panipat, Haryana PAN: CSBPS0914A

For Appellant: Shri Manoj Kumar, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 11/08/2025Pronounced: 20/08/2025
1.

The appeal in ITA No.4020/Del/2025 for AY 2012-13 arises out of the order of the ld. National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] in Appeal No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1069727892(1) dated 17.10.2024 against the order of assessment passed u/s 174 r.w.s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 dated 05.12.2019 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by ITO, Ward-4, Panipat (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’). 2. At the outset, I find that there is a delay in filing of appeal by the assessee by 171 days before us. Considering the reasons adduced in the condonation petition supported with an affidavit placed on record, I am inclined to condone the delay and admit the appeal of the assessee for adjudication. 3. The only issue to be decided on merits in this appeal is as to whether the learned CITA was justified in confirming the addition made on account of cash deposit made in the bank account in the facts and circumstances of the instant case. 4. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the materials available on record. On perusal of the order of the ld CITA, I find that the ld CITA had decided the issue ex parte without adjudicating the issue on merits giving its independent finding. Hence, in the interest of justice and fairplay, I deem it fit and appropriate to restore this appeal to file of ld CITA for de novo adjudication in accordance with law. Needless to mention the assessee be given reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to cooperate with ld CITA for expeditious disposal of the appeal by not taking unwarranted adjournments. Hence, the grounds raised by the assessee on merits are allowed for statistical purposes. 5. The other grounds raised by the assessee challenging the validity of reopening of assessment are also restored to the file of ld CITA. The assessee is given liberty to file additional grounds and additional evidences, if any, in support of his contentions, which shall be duly considered by the ld CITA. The ld CITA is directed to pass a speaking order after taking into account all the evidences placed on record by the assessee. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20/08/2025. - (M. BALAGANESH)

ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 20/08/2025
A K Keot

SATBIR SHARMA,PANIPAT vs INCOME TAX OFFICER, PANIPAT | BharatTax