KHVATEC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, NOIDA UP
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request for withdrawal as the appeal had become infructuous. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee preferred an appeal against the Final Assessment Order. At the time of hearing, the assessee informed that they did not wish to press the appeal and wanted to withdraw it due to procedural reasons where two appeal numbers were allotted for the same grounds.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can be permitted to withdraw the appeal when it has become infructuous and the Revenue has no objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘I’: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SUDHIR PAREEK & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
The aforetitled appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the Final Assessment Order dated 28.09.20224 passed by the Learned Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C (13) r.w.s. s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), pursuant to ITA No.-5650/Del/2024 KHVATEC India Pvt. Ltd. the directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel Dated 30.08.2024 for the Assessment Year 2021-22.
At the time of hearing before us, Ld. AR for Assessee informed 2. that the assessee did not wish to press this appeal; and that the assessee wished to withdraw this appeal. However, the assessee emailed a written petition, wishes to withdraw the appeal. In the said petition, it has been stated that the assessee no longer wishes to press and desires to withdraw the same. The relevant contents of the same are reproduced as under:
“The Appellant respectfully submits that it wishes to withdraw ITAT Appeal No. 5650/Del/2024 for AY 2021-22 from the ongoing appeal proceedings. It is submitted that due to procedural reasons, two appeal numbers were inadvertently allotted for the same Grounds of Appeal while filing a clarification against the defective notice issued by your good office. Since the other appeal pertaining to the same matter is already under consideration before the Hon’ble Tribunal, the present appeal (No. 5650/Del/2024) is redundant. In view of the above, the appellant humbly requests that the aforesaid appeal may kindly be treated as withdrawn.”
The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Departmental Representative) (“Ld. CIT(DR)”, for short) did not object to withdrawal of the appeal by Assessee.
ITA No.-5650/Del/2024 KHVATEC India Pvt. Ltd. 4. In light of the written request for withdrawal by the assessee, and there being no objection from the Revenue, carefully perused the records, it is expedient to grant the assessee / appellant’s desired leave to withdraw the appeal, as it has become infructrous. Accordingly, the same is granted, and consequently, this appeal has been dismissed as withdrawn. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn, as indicated above.
Order pronounced in open court on 20.08.2025
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026