DY CIT 11 (3)(1), MUMBAI vs. TOTAL OIL INDIA PVT LTD., MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding that the demurrage charges were not taxable in India and therefore, no TDS was required. Similarly, reimbursements of seconded employees' salaries were held to be covered under Section 192 and not Section 195, with taxes already paid.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order deleting disallowances made on account of non-deduction of TDS on demurrage charges and reimbursement of expenses. The assessee argued that these payments were reimbursements and not taxable in India due to DTAA provisions.
What were the issues?
Whether demurrage charges paid to non-residents are taxable in India and require TDS, and whether reimbursement of salaries for seconded employees falls under Section 195 or Section 192.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(18)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT663 citing10 SCC 29 · 2010 · Read judgment
- CIT v. Eli Lily & Co.221 citing312 ITR 225 · 2009 · SC
- Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation and Others v. CIT88 citing314 ITR 309 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- Centrica India Offshore Pvt.Ltd. v. CIT87 citing44 Taxmann.com 300 · 2014 · HC
- IDS Software Solutions P. Ltd. v. ITO50 citing122 TTJ 410 · 2009 · ITAT
- CIT v. Dr. Devendra Gupta45 citing349 ITR 493 · 2012 · HC
- Union of India v. Gosalia Shipping P. Ltd.37 citing3 SCC 23 · 1978
- Flipkart Internet (P). Limited v. DCIT International Taxation33 citing139 Taxmann.com 595 · 2022 · HC
- Burt Hill Designs (P) Ltd. v. DDIT(IT)32 citing79 Taxmann.com 459 · 2017
- S India(P)Ltd. v. CIT32 citing287 ITR 421 · 2006
- 21.2 In Pr. CIT-2 v. M/s Boeing India Pvt. Ltd.28 citing146 Taxmann.com 131 · 2023 · HC
- Mond. Iqbal Madar Sheikh v. State of Maharashtra27 citing1 SCC 722 · 1981
- CCCEST v. Northern Operating Systems (P.) Ltd.21 citing138 Taxmann.com 359 · 2022 · SC
- Ernst & Young U.S. LLP v. ACIT (IT)16 citing153 Taxmann.com 95 · 2023
- CIT v. Dempo and Co. Pvt Ltd.15 citing381 ITR 303 · 2016 · HC
- CIT v. 003 Engineers13 citing32 Taxmann.com 271 · 2013 · HC
- 11 citing
- DDIT v. Tekmark Global Solutions LLC11 citing38 SOT 7 · 2010 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY&F SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Amarjit Singh (AM):
P a g e | 2 ITA No.6997/Mum/2019 & C.O. 57/Mum/2021 Dy.CIT-11(3)(1) Vs. Total Oil India Pvt. Ltd.
The appeal filed by the revenue is directed against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A)-55, Mumbai. Since the app
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(i)
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
- DDIT(It)- 1(1), Mumbai vs M/S. American Express Bank Ltd., MumbaiITA 5667/MUM/2004[2000-01]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6198/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026