M/S. GIIRAJ SPINTEX PVT. LTD., ,BHILWARA vs. ITO, WARD-1, BHILWARA

PDF
ITA 211/JODH/2019Status: DisposedITAT Jodhpur20 September 2023AY 2015-164 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH ‘SMC’, JODHPUR

Before: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE- & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL

Hearing: 14.09.2023Pronounced: 20.09.2023

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH ‘SMC’, JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No. 211/Jodh/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16 (Through Virtual Mode) M/s. Giriraj Spintex Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income-tax Officer, B-18, Gokul, Basant Vihar, Ward-1, Bhilwara. Bhilwara. PAN: AABGG3426G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Priyansh Arora, Adv. Revenue by : Sh. Rajeev Mohan, JCIT-DR

Date of hearing : 14.09.2023 Date of pronouncement: 20.09.2023

ORDER This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated

01.08.2018 of learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Ajmer for the assessment year 2015-16.

2.

There is delay of 236 days in filing the present appeal. After considering the submissions of the parties and perusing materials on

record, we are of the view that the delay in filing the appeal was due

2 ITA No. 211/Jodh/2019

to reasonable cause. Accordingly we condone the delay and admit

the appeal for adjudication on merits.

3.

When the appeal was called out, at the very outset, learned

counsel appearing for the assessee, on instructions, submitted that

ground No. 1 & 2 have been wrongly taken, as the assessee has

already been granted the desired relief by the first appellate authority.

Thus, he did not press these two grounds. In view of the aforesaid

submission of learned counsel for the assessee, ground Nos. 1 & 2

are dismissed as not pressed.

4.

Even, in so far as ground No. 3 is concerned, learned counsel

submitted that the figure of disallowance mentioned at Rs.1,00,000/-

is by mistake. Actual disallowance, which remains after first appellate

order is Rs.50,000/-. Be that as it may, the only surviving ground is

ground No. 3. Hence, we proceed to decide this ground.

5.

Briefly, the facts relating to the issue are, the assessee is a

resident corporate entity stated to be engaged in the manufacturing

and sale of synthetic fabrics. In the assessment year under dispute,

the assessee had filed its return of income on 22.09.2015 declaring

3 ITA No. 211/Jodh/2019

income of Rs.5,51,890/-. In course of assessment proceedings, the

Assessing Officer called for various information and details. After

examining them, he observed, in respect of expenses claimed the

assessee was unable to furnish complete set of bills and vouchers.

Accordingly, on purely estimate basis he disallowed an amount of

Rs.1,00,000/- out of expenses claimed. The assessee contested the

aforesaid disallowance before learned first appellate authority. After

considering the submissions of the assessee, learned first appellate

authority restricted the disallowance to Rs.50,000/-.

6.

We have considered rival submissions and perused materials

on record. A reading of the assessment order reveals that the

Assessing Officer has not identified the specific expenses, in

connection with which, the assessee could not furnish the required

bills/vouchers. In fact, the assessment order on this aspect is cryptic

and bereft of any discussion. The Assessing Officer has not specified

what is the nature of expenditure he proposed to disallow. Thus, the

disallowance is purely of adhoc nature without any reasonable basis.

Even, learned first appellate authority has reduced the disallowance

to Rs.50,000/- without assigning any reason why the disallowance

4 ITA No. 211/Jodh/2019

has to be made. Since the disallowance made and sustained by the

departmental authorities is without proper reasoning, we are inclined

to delete the disallowance of Rs.50,000/- sustained by learned first

appellate authority. However, it is made clear, this decision of ours is

purely based on the facts involved in the present appeal, hence,

cannot be taken as a precedent.

7.

In the result, appeal is allowed as indicated above.

Order pronounced in the open court on 20/09/2023. Sd/- Sd/- (GIRISH AGRAWAL) (SAKTIJIT DEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE-PRESIDENT

Dated: 20.09.2023 *aks/-

M/S. GIIRAJ SPINTEX PVT. LTD., ,BHILWARA vs ITO, WARD-1, BHILWARA | BharatTax